The company is hard to summarize
Pages leave out important context, scatter it, or frame it inconsistently.
Where GEO problems show up
Good work exists, but proof is buried
Useful examples sit on the site without enough clarity for search and answer engines to surface them confidently.
Buyer questions are answered weakly
The site lacks direct plain-language pages for the questions buyers and AI systems actually ask.
What gets checked in a SplashCandy GEO review?
Core company explanation
Can a system quickly understand what the company does, who it serves, and what kinds of problems it solves?
Support-page coverage
Are there direct pages that answer high-intent buyer questions in plain language?
Proof visibility
Do current examples and product evidence appear clearly enough to support trust and visibility?
Metadata and crawl structure
Each of these affects whether AI systems find and summarize the right page. Canonical URLs are the one official address for each page. Sitemap coverage is the list of pages you ask search systems to read. Titles and descriptions are the headline and summary a page shows in results. Structured data is labeling that tells systems what a page contains.
What comes out of the review?
Gap map
A short list of where the current site or visibility layer is weak, unclear, or structurally incomplete.
Priority page recommendations
Specific suggested support pages, comparison pages, explanation pages, or examples that would make retrieval cleaner.
Execution path
A practical sequence: what to rewrite, what to add, what to package, and what to verify after the changes land.